USD · Annual median
A COMPARABLE PAY SNAPSHOTGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Lawyer pay compared.
Compare Lawyer pay at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP using the same pay measurement, currency, reported geography scope and disclosed period. Each employer keeps its own sample size and compensation breakdown.
Absolute difference between the two selected employer medians
Reported geography scope is matched; work locations and levels can differ
Matched offered annual base wages
These visa-program wage filings describe offers, not realized total compensation or the entire workforce. Both benchmarks use one matched evidence definition. Each row keeps its sample denominator and available component breakdown. Unknown components stay undisclosed.
BENCHMARK EVIDENCE
Read data as MarkdownPay figures you can check.
Selected supported source cohorts for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP: Lawyer pay comparison. These are individual benchmarks, not an average across employers or levels.
Lawyer · Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP · All reported locations
For Lawyer at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP in All reported locations, the median offered annual base wage is USD $267,500. The sample denominator is 30 offered-wage filings. Measurement period: FY 2026 filings. Benchmark year: 2026.
Wages.fyi calculates this median from available regulatory wage filings. Filings describe offered base wages, not realized employee earnings or total compensation. Bonus and equity are not inferred.
Coverage refreshed . Refresh dates can differ from when compensation was earned or wages were offered.
Lawyer · Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP · All reported locations
For Lawyer at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP in All reported locations, the median offered annual base wage is USD $310,000. The sample denominator is 28 offered-wage filings. Measurement period: FY 2026 filings. Benchmark year: 2026.
Wages.fyi calculates this median from available regulatory wage filings. Filings describe offered base wages, not realized employee earnings or total compensation. Bonus and equity are not inferred.
Coverage refreshed . Refresh dates can differ from when compensation was earned or wages were offered.
Only public source benchmarks with at least five samples and a disclosed median appear here. Samples can overlap and are never added into an employee total. Source sampling methods apply; published sample counts are not guaranteed to represent unique employees. Missing pay components stay undisclosed. Methodology.
THE EMPLOYER BREAKDOWN
Explore career pay →Two employers. The same measurement.
2 selected cohorts shown. Open a row for the full pay definition and components.
| EMPLOYER / ROLE | TOTAL COMP | BASE SALARY | STOCK / YEAR | CASH BONUS | CONTEXT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPLawyerAll reported locations | Not disclosedUSD · Median | $267,500 | — | — | Offered base wage · filing cohort30 filingsFY 2026 filings · Oct 18, 2026 | |
ST Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPLawyerAll reported locations | Not disclosedUSD · Median | $310,000 | — | — | Offered base wage · filing cohort28 filingsFY 2026 filings · Oct 18, 2026 |
Questions about this pay market.
Which employer has the higher published base wage median?
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP reports $267,500 and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP reports $310,000 for this matched Lawyer snapshot. The absolute published median gap is $42,500. Different sample populations can produce different results; these group medians do not predict an individual offer.
What makes this a fair comparison?
Both selected anchors share the career, pay measurement, currency, public evidence class, reported geography scope and period. The period is FY 2026 filings. We do not map company-specific levels onto one another or combine sample counts.
How should I compare an actual offer?
For an offer from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP or Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, compare guaranteed annual base, expected or guaranteed bonus, annual equity and signing pay separately. Keep the level, work location and vesting terms alongside the amounts. A target bonus is not guaranteed pay.
Does a missing component mean zero?
An undisclosed bonus, equity award or benefit remains unknown. Disclosed component medians can describe different parts of a source cohort and may not add to the headline total. Your written offer determines your package.
Put the numbers to work.
Compare two written offers
Keep first-year cash, recurring pay and equity terms separate.
Read the Wages.fyi guide →Understand the whole package
Base, bonus, signing cash and annual equity answer different questions.
Read the Wages.fyi guide →Read offered-wage evidence
Learn what regulatory filings can tell you about a pay market.
Read the Wages.fyi guide →FOLLOW THE COMPARISON
All salary markets →Continue your salary research.
EMPLOYER COMPARISON
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Latham & Watkins LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Sidley Austin (US) LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONDavis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONDavis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Latham & Watkins LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONDavis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Sidley Austin (US) LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONDavis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Latham & Watkins LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Sidley Austin (US) LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →EMPLOYER COMPARISONLatham & Watkins LLP vs. Sidley Austin (US) LLP
Lawyer · Base pay coverage
Explore the pay context →Build a clearer picture for your next decision.
Share your own compensation or tell us the hiring markets your team needs. Contributions are moderated and published only in supported anonymous groups.
Know the number behind the number.
Our methodology Base wages, total compensation, source estimates, and employer ranges are measured separately. Sample counts and reporting periods travel with every benchmark.